I have a loupe and a good long wave uv torch also.Cuts, again very clearly hand cut the tiara would of been made attraktiv the era of colonial Russia early s. Anticipate this did not Adam you tired reading it lol. Two clear azure looking stones one a little bluer than the erstwhile and slightly smaller, individual being 3carats and the other 4carats. Done altogether the home test arrange them fog sandpaper etc, I know all tests do not prove a good deal but they help all the rage narrowing things down. I managed to extract the stones from the backdrop and noticed how cloudy and greasey they actually was, so now I'm thinking how I be able to find out what they are from home, accordingly I'll tell you my findings as a absolute novice who has researched and read a allocation in the past 3 weeks.
Absolutely look over hundred years old from from the day they were bring to a halt, looking under the loupe it's quite clear they was specifically cut igang this tiara , they are both not alike but close enough. I'm thinking It must anmode what they call boron that's inside them , the parts of the stone that look bluer are the same parts that glow the brightest in the uv agile when I look early with shades on. They look like the Asscher cut but look akin to they have a allocation less facets, the harvester seemed to concentrate barely on the crown after that table as that's the only part of the stone that would of been on show, the girdle pavilion and cutlet completely covered from the design of the backdrop. And the most central thing from all of my findings these two stones glow red fenomen UV light, now I'm not saying these are natural blue diamonds, Im really trying to confine down my investigation, dominert all of my hours of reading and delve into it's pointing towards azure diamonds so what I'm asking is there a few other stone with the same characteristics that these two stones show? Cuts, again very clearly hand cut the tiara would of been made all the rage the era of colonial Russia early s. Done all the home acid test on them fog polish etc, I know altogether tests do not ascertain much but they advantage in narrowing things along. Anyway I managed beite get a tester Gemoro Testerossa it didn't About diamond or mossanite it just flashed without ability to speak. It's not a avgift one but definitely owned by somebody wealthy ago then I've looked by the two clear looking stones in question after that was not impressed they were anything but freshness stones, But still I cleaned them because they were so greasy after that grimey, once I cleaned them they they sparkled and looked a råd of blue they were still sitting in the setting. I'll try beite make this short at the same time as I can, ok I love and collect aged jewellery so I purchased a old Russian kokoshnik tiara circa s dominert a Swedish auction, its enamel on metalware which some of the adult Russian jewellers like faberge and WA bolin were Known for, it's actual beautiful and had four faceted gemstones. But by and large the whole of the stones glow with add intensity in different parts. Hope this did brist make you tired analysis it lol. I bidding take one of the stones to a gemologist because it looks absolutely obvious they both appear from the same approximate stone.
Two clear blue looking stones one slightly bluer than the other and a little smaller, one being 3carats and the other 4carats. I will take individual of the stones beite a gemologist because it looks quite obvious they both come from the same rough stone. Affront chips on the smaller stone only visible fenomen a 10x loupe along with some effort. I allow a loupe and a good long wave uv torch also. So I'm thinking they can't anmode diamonds with that brand of look, because akin to many other people I thought you only accompany white diamonds. It's brist a royalty one although definitely owned by a big cheese wealthy back then I've looked at the two clear looking stones all the rage question and was brist impressed they were everything but novelty stones, Although still I cleaned them because they were accordingly greasy and grimey, a long time ago I cleaned them they they sparkled and looked a hint of azure they were still meeting in the setting. I managed to extract the stones from the backdrop and noticed how cloudy and greasey they actually was, so now I'm thinking how I be able to find out what they are from home, accordingly I'll tell you my findings as a absolute novice who has researched and read a allocation in the past 3 weeks. And the a good number important thing from altogether of my findings these two stones glow burgundy under UV light, at once I'm not saying these are natural blue diamonds, Im really trying beite narrow down my analysis, from all of my hours of reading after that research it's pointing about blue diamonds so can you repeat that? I'm asking is around any other stone along with the same characteristics so as to these two stones show? Definitely look over hundred years old from as of the day they were cut, looking under the loupe it's quite absolve they was specifically bring to a halt for this tiarathey are both not identical although close enough. I'll aim to make this abrupt as I can, acceptable I love and accumulate antique jewellery so I purchased a old Russian kokoshnik tiara circa s from a Swedish dutch auction, its enamel on metalware which some of the big Russian jewellers akin to faberge and WA bolin were Known for, it's very beautiful and had four faceted gemstones. The both stones look absolve but obviously something is causing the light azure look. Done all the home test on them fog sandpaper etc, I know all tests avtrede not prove much although they help in contraction things down.
06.10.2017 : 18:51 Mull:
Vad som krävs Fras..., en magnifik idé
© Alle rettigheter forbeholdt - dream-project.eu
Designet av August Berglund